Three days that made Aldersgate possible

May 24, 1738, is a day known to a great many Methodists. It is the day John Wesley came to a living faith in Christ and assurance that his sins had been forgiven. We rightly remember this day.

So, too, should we recall the days that came before. If May 24 was the climax of the story, the days — even the years — that came before set the stage. In his journal, Wesley recounts a letter he wrote to a friend that the shared his turmoil and despair in the three days before May 24, which he called days of “continual sorry and heaviness in my heart.”

“I see that the whole law of God is holy, just and good. I know every thought, every temper of my soul ought to bear God’s image an superscription. But how I am fallen from the glory of God! I feel ‘that I am sold under sin.’ I know, that I too deserve nothing but wrath, being full of abominations: And having no good thing in me, to atone for them, or to remove the wrath of God. All my works, my righteousness, my prayers, need an atonement for themselves.”

I genuinely wonder how a 30-something bachelor clergy member in the United Methodist Church today would be treated if he were to express such a troubled state of soul. Would we start by trying to argue him out of his premises. I fear we would.

I fear that a lot of the energy in “counseling” young Rev. Wesley would be to to shake him loose of “fundamentalist” reading the Bible and his obsession with wrath and sin. I fear we would try to talk him out of a sense of his own sinfulness rather than seek to pray him through it.

How would we respond to him when he insists that he deserves nothing but wrath from God and that there is nothing good in him at all? How would we answer when he says that his prayers themselves are an offense and require their own atonement because they do not spring from a true faith in Christ’s saving work? How would he score on the psychological evaluation, I wonder.

And yet, please recall, this is exactly the state of soul that made Wesley ready for May 24. It is this despair and desperation that made what happened that evening on Aldersgate Street in London a day many Methodists still rejoice over.

Hear how Wesley further wrote to his friend in the days before.

“O let no one deceive us by vain words, as if we had already attained this faith! By its fruits we shall know. Do we already feel ‘peace with God,’ and ‘joy in the Holy Ghost?’ Does ‘his Spirit bear witness with our spirit, that we are the children of God?’ Alas, with mine He does not.”

This is the result of what we often call prevenient grace. Here is the conviction that comes upon a sinner in whom God grace has stirred up a sense of his own powerlessness and need. What sad words are those he writes. He seeks peace and has none. He desires joy, and cannot find it. He longs to know himself to be a child of God, and yet the Spirit remains silent.

Is it possible that United Methodism would hold Wesley up as a model in this day? Could we imagine a United Methodism in America that points to words like these and says, “This is the way to real faith.” I fear we would view Wesley — if he were among us — as a fanatic or a fundamentalist rather than as the father of our movement.

How wonderful it would be if we could learn to teach our people to find themselves in a place where they could pray with Wesley, “O thou Saviour of men, save us from trusting in anything but Thee! Draw us after Thee! Let us be emptied of ourselves, and then fill us with all peace and joy in believing; and let nothing separate us from thy love, in time or eternity.”

This is the prayer that might once again be answered in this way, “I felt my heart strangely warmed. I felt I did trust Christ, Christ alone for my salvation: And an assurance was given me, that he had taken away my sins, even mine, and saved me from the law of sin and death.”

Wouldn’t it be great if United Methodism could pray that prayer?

Do you want that, too?

Nonbelievers as evangelists

I have returned recently to the journals of John Wesley. I’ve been re-reading his account of his ministry, looking for wisdom and practical insights about the pastoral craft in the Wesleyan tradition.

In entries from December of 1739, he relates disputes that were going on in the early Methodist movement about the nature of faith and works. There were those who were arguing that Christians should not engage in any kind of works at all prior to coming to saving faith. They should not worship, they should not pray, they should not do good things for the bodies or souls of others. If people do such works before they have been saved, they argued, they would come to trust in those works as the source of their salvation and so never receive the salvation that comes from faith alone.

Wesley could not accept such a position, as he found it contrary to what he called “the Bible-way.” Wesley wrote on December 31, 1739, about a letter he had sent relating his thoughts, including his conviction that those who do not yet have saving faith should use all “the means of grace” because these are the ordinary ways that God conveys his grace to unbelievers.

Among these means of grace, Wesley listed specifically: going to church, taking communion, fasting, using private prayer, reading the Scripture, doing all the temporal good we can, and doing spiritual good.

Wesley here and elsewhere explicitly views communion as a means of grace for unbelievers. Our Methodist practice of open communion goes back a long way.

But he also has an interesting observation about the usefulness of those with no or little belief doing spiritual good — which for Wesley meant witnessing and teaching the faith to others.

He writes, “[T]hose who have not faith, or but in the lowest degree, may have more light from God, more wisdom for the guiding of other souls, than many that are strong in faith.”

What I take Wesley to be saying here is that he has seen in his own ministry that those who do not even believe or have only the first inklings of faith can often be the most equipped for leading others along toward faith. They often do this much better than Christians of deep and long-standing faith.

I find this observation interesting in two ways. First, it speaks to Wesley’s attentiveness to the spiritual life of his flock. He was paying enough attention and was wise enough to see how the weak in faith were often better at bringing others along than the saints of the church. The second thing I find interesting about this is how this is a model of evangelism and discipleship that is quite far from what we often practice. Sharing the faith (in this case it would not make sense to say “sharing our faith” since we are talking about people who don’t yet have faith) is one of the ways God gives us the grace we need to become faith filled.

You don’t figure everything out and then tell people about God. You tell people about God, and as you do that, you come to figure things out and discover you have been given the faith you are sharing with others.

This I find really helpful. At my church, we’ve spent close to a year now being trying to develop our evangelistic habits and ways of thought. We’ve done some new things and reached some new people. In this, I’ve encouraged people to understand and share their witness. We’ve had several members of the church get up on Sunday mornings and talk about the way Jesus changed or helped or touched them.

But this emphasis on witness and sharing faith stories is intimidating for a lot of people. It is intimidating because of the standard things that make people nervous about talking about faith in public or with others. I think it is also intimidating because a lot of people in the church would fall into those categories Wesley calls unbelievers or those of only the lowest degree of faith. If you are told to “share your faith” but your faith is weak or fragile or actually not even really there, it can be pretty intimidating.

But, if telling other people about Jesus or guiding them into a Christian life is itself a means of grace, then we should be encouraging those who do not believe or believe only a little to share the faith of the church with others, which means we need to help model that and equip them for that. We need to encourage this not because it is a church-growth strategy, but because God will use these works of mercy as a way to give people grace and strengthen their faith. Evangelism is a spiritual discipline as much as prayer and attending worship.

In Wesley’s journal this idea was just an aside in part of a larger argument. Reading that was a “wow” moment for me.

Discoveries like that are part of why I am so grateful to have been called to be a Christian called Methodist. How much more alive would our struggling denomination be if we could just recapture some of what God taught us through the ministry of John and Charles Wesley?

Maybe we should sit down and listen

I want to propose a rule for the upcoming General Conference in Charlotte.

It is not one I expect we will adopt.

The rule is simple: The first speakers in every legislative group and the first speakers to every motion on the floor of the conference must be men and women from annual conferences that have actually grown since the last time the General Conference met.

This would have two effects.

First, it would give non-Americans a lot of air time. It would force us to listen to the perspectives from the parts of the church that are actually accomplishing our mission. It would lift up the voices of people who actually know what it is like to bring in new disciples.

Second, it might actually get us focused on our purpose for meeting in the first place.

I know there is a lot of work that needs to happen to keep the machine running. I appreciate that. I really do.

But in all the talk I’ve heard leading up to General Conference, I’ve not heard much talk about what we need to do to actually save more souls. For the last 50+ years, the United Methodist Church in America has been a withering shadow of its former Christ-proclaiming, soul-winning self. Every year, we counted fewer baptisms and fewer numbers, and somehow we convinced ourselves that it was okay because we ran lots of food pantries and marched in the right parades.

For decades, doctrinal disputes and disobedience rent the American church until, at last, we suffered one of the largest splintering of a denomination in the history of the United States. Depending on how you count it, we’ve lost a quarter to a third of our size in the last five years. At General Conference, the delegates will vote on a budget that is 44% smaller than the one they approved in 2016. Forty-four percent!

If American United Methodism were a college basketball team, we would have fired the coach by now.

Meanwhile, in Africa and Asia, United Methodists with much less of what the world counts as resources have been bringing people to Christ for the last 50-70 years to the point that the American church is no longer the largest part of the global UMC. Perhaps, just perhaps, they have something we in America should sit down and listen to.

I won’t pretend that everything is perfect in the African and Asian parts of our denomination, but at least they are actually doing what John Wesley said was supposed to be our only business on earth — saving souls.

How about we let them set the priorities and the agenda for the UMC for a while?