Before LeBron James, we had ‘the decision’

John Stott sums up the evangelical case for the need to make a “decision” for Christ in his classic little book Basic Christianity:

I myself used to think that because Jesus had died on the cross, everyone in the world had been put right with God by some kind of rather mechanical transaction. I remember how puzzled, even offended, I was when it was first suggested to me that I needed to take hold of Christ and his salvation for myself. I thank God that he later opened my eyes to see that I must do more than face up to the fact that I needed a Savior, more even than admit that Jesus Christ was the Savior I needed; it was necessary to accept him as my Savior.

Stott uses the image of Christ waiting at the door, pictured here, to explain the need and the process by which a person receives Christ as Lord and Savior. He ends the chapter with one of the nicer versions of the sinner’s prayer that I have read.

As I read this chapter, two sets of questions that emerge.

First, as a Wesleyan, it still feels pretty mechanical — to use Stott’s word above. The prayer — which I have prayed myself — is treated in some ways like an incantation. If it is prayed, it is done. Stott even goes so far as to warn us not to worry about how we feel after we pray that prayer. Just be know that it is done and be grateful.

This runs directly in the face of Wesleyan assurance. The old Methodist teaching was that we would have a perceptible awareness of the Holy Spirit speaking to our spirit that we are children of God. It was not about feelings, so much, but it was about a palpable spiritual sensation. It is what Wesley referred to when he described his heart being strangely warmed.

The Methodists were also known for the tarrying that often happened between crying out for Jesus and receiving this assurance. The crying out was not conversion. It was not a sign of justification. The sign of justification was the faith that God gave to sinners that Jesus Christ had died for them and pardoned them. It was this faith and assurance that also marked the moment of pardon. I do not believe the old Methodists would tell a sinner that a single prayer without any sense of assurance should be taken as a token of salvation.

Whether we should side with the Methodists or with Stott — or neither — of course is not a settled question. But it helps to be aware of the differences.

Second, I find myself asking about those who cannot respond in the way Stott prescribes. This system of his is built upon a stack of cognitions and the use of language. What about those for whom such things are difficult to impossible? What about people with mental disabilities?

This is a place where I find Scripture does not help immensely. This troubles me at times. At other times, I am aware that Scripture was written for people who are literate — or in communities of literacy — and is mostly addressed to adults with what we call normal mental faculties. It is a means of grace for those who can receive it. But I’m not convinced that means it maps out the ways of grace for those who are not equipped to operate in the cognitive and literacy-based world of Scripture.

Interestingly, for me at least, in a Wesleyan context, it may not be that those with cognitive disabilities need to hear Jesus knocking at the door. It may be that they never shut the door. John Wesley, famously and controversially, argued that we are not condemned for Original Sin but only for actual sins. And for Wesley, actual sins were willful breaches of the law of God. Although Leviticus speaks of unintentional sins, Wesley argued that only intentional sins were actually sins.

In other words, those who cannot understand what they do in terms of God’s commands, are by definition not sinning.

Now, I know this opens a whole can of worms and is not easily dealt with in a simple blog post. Wesley’s notion has been criticized and dismissed by many learned Christians.

But I am not ready to dismiss him. Not, at least, while I struggle to understand what may, in the end, be too high for me to understand.

Advertisements

8 thoughts on “Before LeBron James, we had ‘the decision’

  1. I believe that mentally deficient adults are treated like children. Children are born with a sinful nature but our God is loving and merciful and because of God’s nature, I also believe that He will protect children from the penalty of sin until they reach the “age of accountability” or “the age of moral awareness.”

    Once they reach the age of accountability they will be treated like adults, that is, they need to respond to the gospel by repentance and faith to be saved from the penalty of sin. The penalty of sin is death and eternal separation from the Father. Going to hell is spiritual death. Below is an article and link on this topic. Adely

    Back to the Bible – Q: Is my child in heaven?
    http://www.backtothebible.org/index.php/Q-Is-my-child-in-heaven.html

    Q: Is my child in heaven?

    A: There’s nothing quite so agonizing as the death of a child. As someone said, “The death of a child is like a period placed before the end of a sentence.” It is ironic that every day of the week, many of us walk out our door and never look back, figuring everything is forever, including our children. Often we are too busy to realize that the most precious things we have also can be the most fleeting.

    Those who experience the loss of a child are often filled with questions. At Back to the Bible we frequently get letters from grieving parents. The answers they receive from secular sources are often emotional, but rarely biblical. Sometimes Christians give answers that are biblical, but not very helpful. This pamphlet is designed to be both helpful and biblical in answering grieving parents’ questions about what happened at the death of their little child. Here are some of the most commonly asked questions.

    Are Babies Innocent of Sin?

    In the hunt for answers at the loss of a child, many people say that babies simply cannot understand sin and therefore are innocent. But that’s not what the Bible says. Understanding sin is not required for being under the penalty of sin. Two passages in Psalms tell us about the true nature of children. One says, “Behold, I was brought forth in iniquity” (Ps. 51:5). The other reads, “The wicked are estranged from the womb; they go astray as soon as they are born, speaking lies” (Ps. 58:3). There are no exceptions. All of us are born with a sin nature; even though we have not yet done anything wrong, our nature is sinful. Every baby needs a Savior, just as every adult does.

    The Bible addresses a baby’s need through the blood of Christ. Jesus’ blood was provided for the salvation of mankind–men, women and children. Until we reject the promise of God’s salvation, the benefit of His death is still available to us. Even though babies are not innocent, they have not rejected God’s salvation. The blood of Jesus Christ is there for them.

    Does God Deal with Children the Way He Does with People who Have Never Heard the Gospel?

    Not at all. God has given the heathen a revelation of Himself both in nature and in their own conscience. Psalm 19:1 says, “The heavens declare the glory of God; and the firmament shows His handiwork.” Intelligent minds are not without knowl-edge of God’s existence, even in people groups that have never heard the Gospel explained to them. Romans 1:18-21 says that God’s wrath is against those who suppress the truth in unrighteousness, “because what may be known of God is manifest in them, for God has shown it to them” (v. 19). God has revealed Himself both in external creation and in man’s internal conscience. But when the heathen suppress what they can know about God and choose to worship what they create with their own hands rather than their Creator, they are without excuse.

    But this is not true of a child. Babies do not have minds that can comprehend nature around them or a conscience within them. We cannot treat the question, “Is my child in heaven?” the same way we treat the question, “Is the heathen in heaven?” Adult men and women have had the opportunity to consider and to reject the witnesses that God has given of Himself. Babies, on the other hand, are guilty of having a sin nature, but they have not weighed the evidence and rejected God. They have not been condemned by their own actions as the heathen have.

    What About the Age of Accountability?

    Some people say that there is an age when children become accountable for their actions. But the Bible does not mention an “age of accountability.” Children are culpable for sin when they draw their first breath, but are they accountable at that moment as well? I don’t think so. We must make a distinction between culpability (liability for their sin nature) and accountability (liability for their sinful actions). Isaiah said, “For before the Child shall know to refuse the evil and choose the good, the land that you dread will be forsaken by both her kings” (Isa. 7:16). It’s evident that little children do not have the ability to make moral decisions and to take responsibility for their sins. Still, they are sinners and need a Savior. Perhaps the “age of accountability” should be called “the age of moral awareness.” Children come to a point where they become morally aware; that is, they understand what’s right and what’s wrong.

    So what happens if your child dies before he is aware of what is morally right or wrong? He is still guilty of his sins and must pay the penalty for his sins. That’s where the blood of Jesus Christ comes in. Young children have not rejected the blood of Jesus as the heathen have. It is there for them, covering their sins, washing them clean, even though they have not had the ability to exercise faith in Jesus, which is required for the salvation of men and women who understand the consequences of their sin. A child’s lack of understanding doesn’t deter the power of Jesus’ blood. Only rejecting the blood deters its power, and babies haven’t done that.

    Has God Chosen My Child?

    If your child dies and goes to heaven, is that evidence that God loves your child and has elected him to salvation? I think that is a valid conclusion. Ephesians 1:4 says that we are chosen “in Him before the foundation of the world.” Babies as well as adult believers are chosen in Him before the world began. If they die before they can understand and reject the Gospel, that doesn’t change God’s choice. They are as much a part of God’s family as adults drawn to faith by the Holy Spirit. The blood of Jesus Christ has covered them and washed away their sins, just as it has ours. Just because babies cannot make a decision for God does not prohibit Him from making a decision for them.

    What Will My Little One Be Like in Heaven?

    Will infants and young children be infants and young children for all of eternity? I don’t think so. The Bible doesn’t say for sure, but it does say that when we go to heaven we enjoy privileges that require adult minds, such as praising and glorifying God in meaningful service to Him. J. Vernon McGee said it this way: “I believe with all my heart that God will raise the little ones such that the mother’s arms who have ached for them will have the opportunity of holding them. The father’s hand which never held the little hand will be given the privilege. I believe that little ones will grow up in heaven in the care of their earthly parents if they are saved.” There is no biblical proof for this one way or the other, but it seems logical that babies will not have to endure eternal infancy. If babies cannot fully enjoy this life, how could we expect them to fully enjoy eternal life with God?

    Will I Join My Child Some Day?

    Have you grieved the loss of a child? If so, take heart from the Bible. David grieved the loss of his newborn son. He pondered, “Can I bring him back again? I shall go to him, but he shall not return to me” (2 Sam. 12:23). Your child was not innocent, because no innocent child can be born from two sinful parents (Job 14:4). But I believe your child is in heaven–not because he or she was baptized, but because your child was washed clean by the blood of Jesus. Christ’s death made it possible for the salvation of all mankind, even newborn babies. Your child is in heaven!

    The more difficult question is, “Will you join your little one in heaven some day?” Your baby or child could not make a decision to trust Christ’s death for the payment of his sin. But as a morally responsible adult, you must make a decision. The children of born-again parents do not automatically go to heaven; neither do the parents of children in heaven automatically join them there. If you want to see your child and enjoy a heavenly reunion, you must be born again! Acts 16:31 tells you how: “Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and you will be saved.” Thank God He has made it possible for you to see your child again some day, if you have received Jesus Christ as your Savior.

  2.  The word kadosh means holy.
    Holiness demands accountability, mercy, self control and compassion for the poor and exemption for the handicapped.
    Some handicapped persons are unable either physically or mentally or both incapable of exercising self-control. What they do or not do is not a cognitive decision. They do not by free will make a cognitive decision to break the laws of God because they are unable to process.
    The blind are exempt from the physical reading of God’s Word. They are not excused from hearing the Word of God. Those with spinal cord issues are exempt from hoping in a car and making each and every service but I would bet God’s gives them 10 fold credit when they make an effort to make any service.

    God is a God of Love, Law, Mercy and Justice.
    By God’s own standards and decrees it would be an injustice to those that do not have normal capacity of control due to physical and/ or mental handicap to be held accountable as those with normal intelligence and able bodied persons are.

    I would never question where they stand with God.
    I am sure they will be fine.

    You shall not curse the deaf, nor put a stumbling block before the blind, but shall fear your God: I am the Lord.
    ‘You shall do no injustice in judgment. You shall not be partial to the poor, nor honor the person of the mighty. In righteousness you shall judge your neighbor….
    Lev. 19:14-16

    I would never question where those we refer to as challenged today stand with God.
    I am sure they will be fine.

    I am not gong to get into the feeling thing.
    I will say I believe what I believe based on the promises made, study done and covenants decreed by God., his apostles and prophets through the ages
    I believe by faith and not on any feelings I personally experience.

    1 John 3:20 tells us “God is greater than our feelings”.

    1. Thanks for the comment, d.

      I’m not convinced that “heart” in 1 John 3:20 is the same thing as “feelings.” But I don’t think the witness of the Spirit with our spirit is a matter of feelings either, so that is not a huge deal.

      So it sounds like you agree with my sense that where it says “Repent and believe” the gospel that excludes those who are incapable for some reason of obeying that command. That makes sense.

    1. New Living Translation only one I saw that uses feelings. Rest it is heart or conscience. A couple of the commentaries I skimmed said explicitly that the Greek word was not a word for feelings or affections. NLT is a “thought for thought” translation, so individual words are not translated for meaning.

  3. Not related to the heart of your post, but my sense recently has been that the Scriptures were written for people who were ILLITERATE & not for those who were LITERATE. That’s why they (the Scriptures) were designed more to be heard rather than read.

Comments are closed.