Canterbury & Rome

Here’s a British Catholic’s take on the similarities between the new Archbishop of Canterbury and the new Pope. It gets beyond some of the headlines and media glitz, especially on offering a picture of Pope Francis. For instance:

The future Pope Francis was never a typical Latin American Jesuit. He distrusted Catholic liberation theologians, preferring the company of evangelicals who entered the slums to preach about God and Satan rather than models of economic justice.

Advertisements

3 thoughts on “Canterbury & Rome

  1. I’m not familiar with the Archbishop. Is the point that he prefers the company of evangelicals as well?

      1. The Church of England, still charting a middle way, alternates Archbishoprics between men with an evangelical bent and those with a catholic leaning. Rowan Williams supposedly represented a catholic orientation, although I never understood how, and it makes sense that the new guy would be more evangelical in his understanding and preferences.

        But I wouldn’t refer to Pope Francis as an evangelically oriented Pope. Benedict and JPII weren’t enthusiastic about liberation theology either. What the three share(d), as all modern Popes have, is a rigorous orthodoxy and that is also sometimes emphasized by evangelically oriented Protestants. I think that’s the more apt comparison.

Comments are closed.