Wesley’s sermon structure

I’m constantly on the search for better ideas for sermon structure and organization. So, with a few minutes of time this morning, I got out my copy of John Wesley’s sermons and started listing the pattern of his sermons. (This is easy to to with Wesley because he almost always presents his outline early in the sermon.

In general, he begins with a brief introduction which may define some terms or present a question or debate. The introduction can be very short and seldom wastes any time getting to the issues Wesley wants to deal with.

He often ends the sermon with an exhortation to the listener.

In between, he makes several moves that he sketches out in advance. Here are the notes I took on his first seven sermons.

Salvation By Faith
I. What faith it is through which we are saved
II. What is the salvation which is through faith
III. How we may some objections

The Almost Christian
I. What is implied in being almost
II. What in being altogether, Christian

Awake, Thou That Sleepest (by Charles Wesley)
I. Describe the sleepers
II. Exhort the sleepers to awake
III. Explain the promise made to those who awake

Scriptural Christianity
I. How does it begin to exist in individuals
II. How does it spread from one to another
III. How it comes to cover the earth
IV. A plain practical application

Justification By Faith
I. What is the ground of the doctrine of justification
II. What justification is
III. Who are the justified
IV. On what terms are they justified

The Righteousness of Faith
I. What is the righteousness of the law
II. What is the righteousness of faith
III. The folly of trusting the righteousness of law
IV. The wisdom of submitting to the righteousness of faith

The Way to the Kingdom
I. The nature of true religion, here called “The Kingdom of God”
II. The way thereto, pointed out in the words “Repent and believe the gospel”

One favorite device of his is to use the “is not, but is” structure. So in the first section of “Salvation By Faith” and “The Way to the Kingdom” we get a series of what faith or religion are not before we get to what they really are.

Someone such as Fred Craddock would probably point out that this style and approach worked when the preacher brought some inherent authority to the preaching moment. Wesley did not ignore the audience, but he certainly did not spend his energy evoking and connecting with their needs.

He did not worry about establishing rapport. He did not tell touching of funny stories about himself – although he would use himself as an illustration. More than once he uses his own lack of true faith before Aldersgate to support his assertions about the nature of true Christianity.

It is an interesting approach to sermon construction. I do not know how culturally bound it is. Would it “work” today?