My response to Hamilton’s question

My last post quoted Adam Hamilton’s answer to the question “Why do people need Christ?”

Taylor Burton-Edwards unfairly intruded on my turf as blog owner and asked me how I would answer the question. Since most of you probably do not read all the comments, I thought it might continue the conversation if I were to answer here. So, read on if you dare:

I have not unpacked my answer from all the church language — which is a big part of what I see Hamilton doing with his answer. Mine goes something like this.

We need Jesus Christ because we are sinners. We are lost. We are wretches. We are prodigals. We are wandering in the dark. We need Jesus because without him, we are doomed to death and under the power of death.

Hamilton’s answer strikes me as optimistic about human beings who are without God. It seems to have a default position that says we are all in the blessed kingdom of God unless we do something really bad. And even then we want to haggle about whether it would be loving of God to throw us out.

Maybe I’m just too much of an Eeyore as my daughter says, but I start from a different place. We are in rebellion from God. We are the Israelites with the golden calf. The longings of our heart are not to be trusted so long as we resist the preventing and convicting grace of God. The problems we feel and experience are not to be solved by changing our point-of-view or attitude about Jesus, but by the work of grace that convicts and converts.

And maybe it is just because I am reading the gospel lection this week about self-denial and cross bearing, but I do not see the way of Jesus as about solving our problems, per se. It gives us new problems, bigger problems. It calls us to die so that we might live.

I know this way of answering the question puts me out of touch with the times, but my problem with Hamilton’s answer — for me — is that there are lots of way to fill your empty spaces and find hope in your life. The world has figured out many, many ways to respond to our neediness. We might argue that what we in the church are selling is better, but the price we ask for it is higher than the entertainment industry and the self-help industry and the peddlers of vice. We end up in a cost-benefit discussion with people. It feels like selling laundry detergent.

I suspect that Hamilton would not say any of that is true of his preaching and ministry. But this is how I experience it. It may say as much about me as anything.

This entry was posted in Doctrine, Jesus, Salvation and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to My response to Hamilton’s question

  1. No intention to intrude, John, Feel free to ask any similarly intrusive questions on my blogs.

    You’ve answered the question powerfully, and I think you are correct in your assessment about how Adam’s ideas may well be heard, especially when they are heard outside the context of the overall ministry of Church of the Resurrection. Kenda Creasy Dean and her colleagues are correct that the “default” reading of Christianity in the US today is “moralistic, theistic deism”– and, for better or for worse, Adam’s description can be very easily assimilated by or understood as endorsing that model.

    I might also add that I’m not seeing in Adam’s response much of anything that points to entire sanctification, perfection in love, or a more particularly orthodox Christian eschatology of new creation. At least as I read the Wesleys and from what I know of the early EA and UB preaching, holiness and eschatology were front and center, or at least so deeply interfused throughout their message to provide an unmistakable flavoring that enabled (and still enables) persons to get a foretaste of the complete renewal of all things, and not simply “the answers for my needs.”

    • John Meunier says:

      It would be great to have a dialogue with him about such things. I suspect he has all these things in mind when he writes about the church being the place where we grow into the life that God desires for us.

      I like Wesley’s formulation that justifying grace is what Christ did for us and sanctifying grace is what Christ does in us (through the work of the Holy Spirit.)

    • John Meunier says:

      Taylor, btw, I hope you know I was joking with that comment.

What do you think?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s